黑料吃瓜网

Care Suffers As More Nursing Homes Feed Money Into Corporate Webs

By Jordan Rau

MEMPHIS, Tenn. 鈥 When one of Martha Jane Pierce鈥檚 sons peeled back the white sock that had been covering his 82-year-old mother鈥檚 right foot for a month, he discovered rotting flesh.

鈥淚t looked like a piece of black charcoal鈥 and smelled 鈥渓ike death,鈥 her daughter Cindy Hatfield later testified. After Pierce, a patient at a Memphis nursing home, was transferred to a hospital, a surgeon had to amputate much of her leg.

One explanation for Pierce鈥檚 lackluster care, according to financial records and testimony in a lawsuit brought by the Pierce family, is that her nursing home, Allenbrooke Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, appeared to be severely underfunded at the time, with a $2 million deficit on its books in 2009 and a scarcity of nurses and aides. 鈥淪ometimes we鈥檇 be short of diapers, sheets, linens,鈥 one nurse testified.

That same year, $2.8 million of the facility鈥檚 $12 million in operating expenses went to a constellation of corporations controlled by two Long Island accountants who, court records show, owned Allenbrooke and 32 other nursing homes. The homes paid the men鈥檚 other companies to provide physical therapy, management, drugs and other services, from which the owners reaped profits, according to court records.

In what has become an increasingly common business arrangement, owners of nursing homes outsource a wide variety of goods and services to companies in which they have a financial interest or that they control. Nearly three-quarters of nursing homes in the United States 鈥 more than 11,000 鈥 have such business dealings, known as related party transactions, according to an analysis of nursing home financial records by Kaiser Health News. Some homes even contract out basic functions like management or rent their own building from a sister corporation, saying it is simply an efficient way of running their businesses and can help minimize taxes.

But these arrangements offer another advantage: Owners can establish highly favorable contracts in which their nursing homes pay more than they might in a competitive market. Owners then siphon off higher profits, which are not recorded on the nursing home鈥檚 accounts.

The two Long Island men, Donald Denz and Norbert Bennett, and their families鈥 trusts collected distributions totaling $40 million from their chain鈥檚 $145 million in revenue over eight years 鈥 a 28 percent margin, according to the judge鈥檚 findings of fact. In 2014 alone, Denz earned $13 million and Bennett made $12 million, principally from their nursing home companies, according to personal income tax filings presented in court.

Martha Jane Pierce and husband Billie Mac Pierce Sr. lived at the same Memphis nursing home during his final years. While there, Martha Jane had her leg amputated after an infection went untreated for weeks. Her family spent seven years trying to hold the home鈥檚 owners responsible. (Courtesy of Cindy Hatfield)

Allenbrooke Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in Memphis, Tenn., was understaffed and ran at a deficit at the same time its owners were earning millions of dollars from their chain of nursing homes. (Jordan Rau/Kaiser Health News)

Typical nursing home profits are 鈥渋n the 3 to 4 percent range,鈥 said Bill Ulrich, a nursing home financial consultant.

In 2015, nursing homes paid related companies $11 billion, a tenth of their spending, according to financial disclosures the homes submitted to Medicare.

In California, the related party transactions at another nursing home chain, Brius Healthcare Services. Rental prices to the chain鈥檚 real estate entities were a third higher than rates paid by other for-profit nursing homes in the same counties, according to .

Such corporate webs bring owners a legal benefit, too: When a nursing home is sued, injured residents and their families have a much harder time collecting money from the related companies 鈥 the ones with the full coffers.

After the Pierce family against the nursing home, Denz and Bennett appealed, and their lawyer, Craig Conley, said they would not discuss details of the case or their business while the appeal was pending.

鈥淔or more than a decade, Allenbrooke鈥檚 caregivers have promoted the health, safety and welfare of their residents,鈥 Conley wrote in an email.

Dr. Michael Wasserman, the head of the management company for the Brius nursing homes, called corporate structures a 鈥渘onissue鈥 and said, 鈥淲hat matters at the end of the day is what the care being delivered is about.鈥

Networks of jointly owned limited liability corporations are fully legal and used widely by other businesses, such as restaurants and retailers. Nonprofit nursing homes sometimes use them as well. Owners can have more control over operations 鈥 and better allocate resources 鈥 if they own all the companies. In many cases, industry consultants say, a commonly owned company will charge a nursing home lower fees than an independent contractor might, leaving the chain with more resources.

鈥淵ou don鈥檛 want to pay for someone else to make money off of you,鈥 Ulrich said. 鈥淵ou want to retain that within your organization.鈥

But a Kaiser Health News analysis of federal inspection and quality records reveals that nursing homes that outsource to related organizations tend to have significant shortcomings: They have fewer nurses and aides per patient, they have higher rates of patient injuries and unsafe practices, and they are the subject of complaints almost twice as often as independent homes.

鈥淎lmost every single one of these chains is doing the same thing,鈥 said Charlene Harrington, a professor emeritus of the School of Nursing at the University of California-San Francisco. 鈥淭hey鈥檙e just pulling money away from staffing.鈥

Early Signs Of Trouble

Martha Jane Pierce moved to Allenbrooke in 2008 in the early stages of dementia. According to testimony in the family鈥檚 lawsuit, her children often discovered her unwashed when they visited, with an uneaten, cold meal sitting beside her bed. Hatfield said in court that she had frequently found her mother鈥檚 bed soaked in urine. The front desk was sometimes vacant, her brother Glenn Pierce testified.

鈥淚f you went in on the weekend, you鈥檇 be lucky to find one nurse there,鈥 he said in an interview.

After a stroke, Pierce became partly paralyzed and nonverbal, but the nursing home did not increase the attention she received, said Carey Acerra, one of Pierce鈥檚 lawyers. When Pierce鈥檚 children visited, they rarely saw aides reposition her in bed every two hours, the standard practice to prevent bedsores.

鈥淣ot having enough staffing, we can鈥檛 鈥 we weren鈥檛 actually able to go and do that,鈥 one nurse, Cheryl Gatlin-Andrews, testified in a deposition.

KHN鈥檚 analysis of federal inspection, staffing and financial records nationwide found shortcomings at other homes with similar corporate structures:

(Story continues below.)

For-profit nursing homes employ these related corporations more frequently than nonprofits do, and have fared worse than independent for-profit homes in fines, complaints and staffing, the analysis found. Their fines averaged $25,345, which was 10 percent higher than fines for independent for-profits, and the homes received 24 percent more substantiated complaints from residents. Overall staffing was 4 percent lower than at independent for-profits.

Ernest Tosh, a plaintiffs鈥 lawyer in Texas who helps other lawyers untangle nursing company finances, said owners often exerted control by setting tight budgets that restricted the number of nurses the homes could employ. Meanwhile, 鈥渕oney is siphoned out to these related parties,鈥 he said. 鈥淭he cash flow gets really obscured through the related party transactions.鈥

The , which represents nursing homes, disputed any link between related businesses and poor care. 鈥淥ur members strive to provide quality care at an affordable cost to every resident,鈥 the group said in a statement. 鈥淭here will always be examples of exceptions, but those few do not represent the majority of our profession.鈥

鈥楶iercing The Corporate Veil鈥

The model of placing nursing homes and related businesses in separate limited liability corporations and partnerships has gained popularity as the industry has consolidated through purchases by publicly traded companies, private investors and private equity firms. A encouraged owners to separate their nursing home business into detached entities to protect themselves if the government tried to recoup overpayments or if juries levied large negligence judgments.

鈥淗olding the real estate in a separate real-property entity that leases the nursing home to the operating entity protects the assets by making the real estate unavailable for collection by judgment creditors of the operating entity,鈥 the authors wrote. Such restructuring, they added, was probably not worth it just for 鈥渁dministrative simplicity.鈥

In 2009, the practice had flourished among nursing homes in Texas, which they studied because of the availability of state data. Owners had also inserted additional corporations between them and their nursing homes, with many separated by three layers.

To bring related companies into a lawsuit, attorneys must persuade judges that all the companies were essentially acting as one entity and that the nursing home could not make its own decisions. Often that requires getting access to internal company documents and emails. Even harder is holding owners personally responsible for the actions of a corporation 鈥 known as 鈥減iercing the corporate veil.鈥

At a 2012 Nashville conference for executives in the long-term health care industry, a presentation slide from nursing home attorneys titled 鈥淧ros of Complex Corporate Structure鈥 stated: 鈥淢any plaintiffs鈥 attorneys will never conduct corporate structure discovery because it鈥檚 too expensive and time consuming.鈥 The presentation noted another advantage: 鈥淔inancial statement in punitive damages phase shows less income and assets.鈥

A lawyer in Alabama, Barry Walker, is still fighting an 11-year-old case against another nursing home then owned by Denz and Bennett, according to court records. Walker traced the ownership of Fairfield Nursing and Rehabilitation Center back to the men, but he said the judge had allowed him to introduce the ownership information only after the Alabama Supreme Court ordered him. That trial ended with a hung jury, and Walker said a subsequent judge had not let him present all the information to two other juries, and he dropped the men from the lawsuit. The home closed a few years ago but the case is still ongoing despite two mistrials.

鈥淭he former trial judge and the current trial judge quite frankly don鈥檛 seem to understand piercing the corporate veil,鈥 he said. 鈥淢y firm invested more in the case than we can ever hope to recover. Sometimes it鈥檚 a matter of principle.鈥

The complexity of the ownership in Pierce鈥檚 case was a major reason it took six years to get to a trial, said Ken Connor, one of the lawyers for her family. 鈥淚t requires a lot of digging to unearth what鈥檚 really going on,鈥 he said. 鈥淢ost lawyers can鈥檛 afford to do that.鈥

The research paid off in a rare result: In 2016, the jury issued a $30 million verdict for negligence, of which Denz and Bennett were personally liable for $20 million. The men鈥檚 own tax returns bolstered the case against them. They claimed during trial they delegated daily responsibilities for residents to the home鈥檚 administrators, but they reported on their tax returns that they 鈥渁ctively鈥 participated in the management. The jury did not find the nursing home responsible for Pierce鈥檚 death later in 2009.

The fight is not over. Denz and Bennett are appealing the verdict, the damages, their inclusion and the trial judge鈥檚 decisions. They argue that Tennessee courts should not have jurisdiction over them since they spent little time in the state and neither was involved in the daily operations of the home or in setting staffing levels. Their lawyers said jurors should never have heard from nurses who hadn鈥檛 cared directly for Pierce.

鈥淣o way did I oversee resident care issues,鈥 Bennett testified in a deposition.

Deficient In The End

Whoever was responsible for Pierce鈥檚 care, her family had no doubt it was inadequate. Her son Bill Pierce was so horrified when he finally saw the wound on his mother鈥檚 foot, he immediately insisted that she go to the hospital.

鈥淭he surgeon said he had never seen anything like it,鈥 Hatfield said in an interview. 鈥淗e amputated 60 percent of the leg, above the knee.鈥

After her amputation, Pierce returned to the nursing home because her family did not want to separate her from her husband, who was also there.

At the trial, the nursing home鈥檚 lawyers argued that Pierce鈥檚 leg had deteriorated not because of the infection but because her blood vessels had become damaged from a decline in circulation. The jury was unpersuaded after nurses and aides testified about how Allenbrooke would add staffing for state inspections while the rest of the time their pleas for more support went unheeded.

Workers also testified that supervisors had told them to fill in blanks in medical records regardless of accuracy. One example: Allenbrooke鈥檚 records indicated that Pierce had eaten a full meal the day after she died.

Data editor Elizabeth Lucas contributed to this report.


黑料吃瓜网 News鈥 coverage of these topics is supported by , and

Exit mobile version