Can鈥檛 see the audio player?聽.
The medical and economic needs laid bare by the coronavirus pandemic are forcing some immediate changes to the U.S. health system. Congress, in its latest relief bill, provided $100 billion in funding for the hospital industry alone. Meanwhile, the federal government has quickly removed previous barriers to telehealth and other sometimes controversial practices.
But big fights are still brewing, including whether the federal government will reopen the Affordable Care Act marketplaces it runs and whether states can use emergency powers to ban abortions as 鈥渆lective medical procedures.鈥�
This week鈥檚 panelists are Julie Rovner of Kaiser Health News, Joanne Kenen of Politico, Margot Sanger-Katz of The New York Times and Alice Miranda Ollstein of Politico.
Among the takeaways from this week鈥檚 podcast:
- The ACA was passed on the heels of the Great Recession. The coronavirus outbreak has produced the first big economic downturn since then, and the law鈥檚 provisions to expand Medicaid and to provide an insurance option to those without jobs could provide a critical safety net during this crisis.
- About a dozen states running their own ACA insurance marketplaces have opened up enrollment again to let people who did not enroll in the fall but are feeling the pinch from the coronavirus pandemic to reconsider. President Donald Trump said this week that he is mulling a similar move, but the messages from the administration on such action have been confusing.
- People who had insurance through work and have lost their jobs don鈥檛 need a special enrollment period to sign up for an Obamacare plan. They are eligible because their job situation changed. However, the administration has not been publicizing that message.
- Hospitals are eager to receive the $100 billion appropriated by Congress in response to the influx of patients with COVID-19, the disease caused by the coronavirus. But the administration has not yet said how that money will be apportioned.
- A handful of states have prohibited abortions during the coronavirus emergency because, officials say, they are seeking to preserve protective gear for hospital staff treating COVID-19 patients. But it鈥檚 not clear that the abortion procedures 鈥� especially medication abortions 鈥� are interfering with efforts to safeguard protective clothing or masks needed by hospitals. And women who do not get abortions will consume far more medical care by remaining pregnant and giving birth.
Also, this week, Rovner interviews KHN鈥檚 Liz Szabo, who reported the latest KHN-NPR 鈥�Bill of the Month鈥� installment about a patient who underwent a very expensive genetic test. If you have an outrageous medical bill you would like to share with us, you can do that here.
Plus, for extra credit, the panelists recommend their favorite health policy stories of the week they think you should read too:
Julie Rovner: The New York Times鈥� 鈥�,鈥� by David E. Sanger, Zolan Kanno-Youngs and Nicholas Kulish
Joanne Kenen: The New Yorker鈥檚 鈥�,鈥� by Jonathan Blitzer
Margot Sanger-Katz: Bloomberg News鈥� 鈥�,鈥� by Olivia Carville, Emma Court and Kristen V. Brown
Alice Miranda Ollstein: The Washington Post鈥檚 鈥溾�� by Amy Goldstein
To hear all our podcasts,听click here.
And subscribe to What the Health? on聽,听,听,听, or聽.