SACRAMENTO, Calif. California is the first state to ban doctors and medical examiners from attributing deaths to the controversial diagnosis known as excited delirium, which a human rights activist hailed as a watershed moment that could make it harder for police to justify excessive force.
Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom to prohibit coroners, medical examiners, physicians, or physician assistants from listing excited delirium on a persons death certificate or in an autopsy report. Law enforcement wont be allowed to use the term to describe a persons behavior in any incident report, and testimony that refers to excited delirium wont be allowed in civil court. The law takes effect in January.
The term excited delirium has been around for decades but has been used increasingly over the past 15 years to explain how a person experiencing severe agitation can die suddenly through no fault of the police. It was cited as a legal defense in the 2020 deaths of George Floyd in Minneapolis; Daniel Prude in Rochester, New York; and Angelo Quinto in Antioch, California, among others.
This is a watershed moment in California and nationwide, said Joanna Naples-Mitchell, a lawyer with the New York-based , who co-authored a on the use of the diagnosis.
In a wrongful death lawsuit, if excited delirium comes up, it's a big hurdle for a family getting justice if their family member was actually killed by police, Naples-Mitchell said. So, now it will be basically impossible for them to offer testimony on excited delirium in California.
Even though the new law makes California the first state to no longer recognize excited delirium as a medical diagnosis, several national medical associations already discredited it. Since 2020, the and the have rejected excited delirium as a medical condition, noting the term has disproportionately applied to Black men in law enforcement custody. This year, the National Association of Medical Examiners as a cause of death, and the American College of Emergency Physicians is expected to vote this month on whether to formally disavow its supporting excited delirium as a diagnosis. That white paper proposed individuals in a mental health crisis, often under the influence of drugs or alcohol, can exhibit superhuman strength as police try to control them, and then die from the condition.
In the case of Quinto, his mother, Cassandra Quinto-Collins, had called Antioch police two days before Christmas because her son was experiencing a mental health crisis. She had subdued him by the time they arrived, she said, but officers held her 30-year-old son to the ground until he passed out.
In a harrowing home video taken by Quinto-Collins, which was broadcast nationally after his death, she asked police what happened as her son lay on the floor unconscious, hands behind his back in handcuffs. He died three days later in the hospital.
The Contra Costa County coroners office, part of the sheriffs department, blamed Quintos death on excited delirium. The Quinto family has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the county and is seeking to change the cause of death on his death certificate.
Quinto-Collins also testified in favor of the bill, AB 360, introduced by state Assembly member Mike Gipson, a Democrat. It sailed through the legislature with bipartisan support. No organization formally opposed the measure, including the California Police Chiefs Association, whose executive director declined to comment this week.
There's a lot more work to be done, but it is a unique window into some of the corruption, some of the things that we've allowed to happen under our noses, said Robert Collins, Quintos stepfather. I think it's really telling that California is ending it.
Part of the problem with an excited delirium diagnosis is that delirium is a symptom of an underlying condition, medical professionals say. For example, delirium can be caused by old age, hospitalization, a major surgery, substance use, medication, or infections, said Sarah Slocum, a psychiatrist in Exeter, New Hampshire, who co-authored a published in 2022.
You wouldn't just put fever on someone's death certificate, Slocum said. So, it's difficult to then just put excited delirium on there as a cause of death when there is something that's underlying and driving it.
In California, some entities already had restricted the use of excited delirium, such as the , which prohibits the term in its written reports and policy manual.
But these changes confront decades of conditioning among law enforcement and emergency medical personnel who have been taught that excited delirium is real and trained how to handle someone suspected of having it.
There needs to be a systematic retraining, said Abdul Nasser Rad, managing director of research and data at , a nonprofit group that focuses on criminal justice reform and helped draft the California law. There's real worry about just how officers are being trained, how EMS is being trained on the issue.
This article was produced by 窪蹋勛圖厙 News, which publishes , an editorially independent service of the .泭
窪蹋勛圖厙 News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFFan independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .