Rapid at-home covid tests are flying off store shelves across the nation and are largely sold out online as the delta variant complicates a return to school, work and travel routines.
But at $10 or $15 a test, the price is still far too high for regular use by anyone but the wealthy. A family with two school-age children might need to spend $500 or more a month to try to keep their family 鈥� and others 鈥� safe.
For Americans looking for swift answers, the cheapest over-the-counter covid test is the Abbott Laboratories BinaxNOW two-pack for $23.99. Close behind are tests, at $15 a pop. Yet supplies are dwindling. After a surge in demand, CVS is people can buy, and Amazon and Walgreen鈥檚 website were sold out as of Friday afternoon.
President Joe Biden said Thursday he would invoke the Defense Production Act to make 280 million rapid covid tests available. The administration struck a deal with Walmart, Amazon and Kroger for them to sell tests for 鈥渦p to 35 percent less鈥� than current retail prices for three months. For those on Medicaid, the at-home tests will be fully covered, Biden said.
An increased supply should help to lower prices. As schools open and much of the country languishes without pandemic-related restrictions, 鈥� along with vaccination and mask-wearing 鈥� is critical to controlling the delta variant鈥檚 spread. Yet shortages, little competition and sticky high prices mean routine rapid testing remains out of reach for most Americans, even if prices drop 35%.
Consumers elsewhere have much cheaper 鈥� or free 鈥� options. In Germany, grocery stores are selling rapid covid tests for under $1 per test. In India, they鈥檙e . The provides 14 tests per person free of charge. Canada is to businesses.
Michael Mina, assistant professor of epidemiology at Harvard University, lauded Biden鈥檚 announcement while saying he 鈥渉ad some reservations鈥� about its scale and noted that 280 million tests represent 鈥渓ess than one test per person over the course of a year.鈥�
Rep. Kim Schrier (D-Wash.) for months has advocated for rapid testing at a lower cost. 鈥淚n an ideal world, a test would either be free or cost less than a dollar so that people could take one a few times a week to every day,鈥� she said in the days before Biden鈥檚 announcement.
Biden鈥檚 initiative 鈥渋s a great start鈥� for broader rapid testing, Schrier said Friday. 鈥淏ut there is a lot more to be done, and that must be done quickly, to use this really important tool to combat this virus.鈥�
A nationwide survey by the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Hart Research found that 79% of adults would regularly test themselves at home if rapid tests cost a dollar. But only a third would do so if the cost was $25.
Billions in taxpayer dollars have been invested in these products. Abbott Laboratories, for instance, cashed in on hundreds of millions in federal contracts and gave its shareholders fat payouts last year, . Even so, according to , as demand for rapid tests cratered in early summer, Abbott destroyed its supplies and laid off workers who had been making them.
More than a year ago, the company would sell its BinaxNOW in bulk for $5 a test to health care providers, but that option is not available over the counter to the public. Even with the anticipated price decrease, a two-pack will be more than $15. Abbott did not comment further.
Schrier that test prices were high because 鈥渂ig companies are buying up all the supplies.鈥� Also, 鈥渢heir profit is far higher making 1,000 $30 tests than 30,000 $1 tests鈥� 鈥� in other words, they can make the same amount of money for many fewer tests.
In March, the Biden administration as part of the American Rescue Plan Act to perform covid testing in schools, leaving the rollout largely to states. This followed $760 million spent by the Trump administration to buy 150 million of Abbott鈥檚 rapid-response antigen tests, many of which went to schools. The rollout has , with states like Missouri mired in logistical challenges.
In late August, Schrier wrote asking four federal agencies to update their distribution plans. She also urged the government to increase spending on rapid testing, saying 鈥渢ime is of the essence鈥� as children returned to school.
Antigen tests can give real-time information to people exposed to covid, said Dr. Dara Kass, an associate professor of emergency medicine at Columbia University Medical Center. Waiting for lab results from polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests can take days, and many states 鈥� particularly in the hard-hit South 鈥� are seeing appointments fill up days in advance. At-home collection kits for PCR tests can cost over $100.
Rapid tests take under 15 minutes to detect covid by pinpointing proteins, called antigens. The tests are similar to a pregnancy test, with one or two lines displayed, depending on the result.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that fully vaccinated people exposed to covid wear a mask indoors for two weeks and get tested three to five days after exposure. The unvaccinated should quarantine for 14 days. But that leaves gray area for those vaccinated people hoping to attend classes or go about their lives, Kass said.
鈥淩apid tests give information,鈥� she added, 鈥渢hat allows somebody to engage in society safely.鈥� People can follow up with a PCR test, which is more sensitive, for confirmation of a diagnosis.
In , for example, a 鈥淭est and Stay鈥� strategy for students exposed to covid allows them to remain in school: Students take BinaxNOW tests five days in a row following close contact with an infected person.
have been developed in the U.S. 鈥� though just six companies have FDA authorization for over-the-counter use. No rapid covid tests have full FDA approval. Two rapid molecular options, made by Lucira Health and Cue Health, also have emergency use authorization (EUA).
鈥淯nfortunately, many submissions are incomplete or contain insufficient information for FDA to determine that they meet the statutory criteria,鈥� FDA spokesperson James McKinney said.
The agency has taken a stricter stance than its European counterparts. In June, the FDA , stating that the agency had 鈥渟ignificant concerns that the performance of the test has not been adequately established.鈥� Yet in the U.K., which , the regulatory agency 鈥檇 the product.
In Germany, regulators have given special authorization to .
鈥淎s long as these tests are regulated as medical devices, the FDA has to regulate them not as critical public health tools, but as medical tools, with all of the onerous clinical trials that slow everything down 100-fold,鈥� Mina .
With only a handful of rapid tests on the market, it is harder for companies that have not yet received FDA authorization to catch up and, in turn, drive the prices down, said Michael Greeley, co-founder and general partner at Flare Capital Partners, a venture capital firm focused on health care technology. 鈥淚f we鈥檙e talking about people testing their kids every day going to school,鈥� he added, 鈥渇or many families, the current costs are a real burden.鈥�
Broad adoption of rapid testing seems premature, he said, even with a mass purchase of tests by the U.S. government: 鈥淲e can鈥檛 even get people to floss, so the idea that people are now going to start rapid testing as their standard operating procedure is a flawed assumption.鈥�
Regardless, companies can鈥檛 keep up with demand.
Ellume said it saw a 900% spike in the use of its tests over the past month. Its at-home rapid test costs up to $38.99. On , it was listed for $26.10 Friday but was out of stock.
The Australian manufacturer from the U.S. Defense Department in February to scale up production, after the FDA authorized its at-home use late last year. But the federal Health Care Enhancement Act, which furnished the funding, does not impose pricing restrictions. Ellume said it will begin production at a Frederick, Maryland, plant this fall. For now, it is shipping tests from Australia.
This summer, Lucira Health stopped selling its about $50 molecular rapid test online to focus on larger clients, including San Francisco鈥檚 Chase Center, home to the Golden State Warriors, and the Olympics, Dan George, Lucira鈥檚 chief financial officer, .
The company is as it ramps up production but hopes to return to selling directly on its website and Amazon later this year.