黑料吃瓜网

Skip to content
What Missouri Learned the Hard Way About Rapid Covid Testing in Schools
Ronnie Godby sprays disinfectant on desks and chairs as he and other school custodians clean a classroom at Richard Simpson Elementary School in Arnold, Missouri, on Nov. 5. Missouri schools have taken several steps to keep the coronavirus out of schools, including mask-wearing, disinfection, temperature checks and testing. (Colter Peterson/St. Louis Post-Dispatch via AP)
COVID-19

What Missouri Learned the Hard Way About Rapid Covid Testing in Schools

Early in the tumultuous 2020-21 school year, Missouri officials made a big gamble: set aside roughly 1 million rapid covid tests for the state鈥檚 K-12 schools in hopes of quickly identifying sick students or staff members.

The Trump administration had spent $760 million to procure 150 million rapid-response antigen tests from Abbott Laboratories, including 1.75 million allotted for Missouri, telling states to use them as they saw fit. Nearly 400 Missouri charter, private and public school districts applied. Given supply constraints, each was offered one test per person, according to interviews with school officials and documents KHN obtained in response to a public records request.

What began as an ambitious plan landed with a thud. Few of the tests were used; according to state data updated in early June, schools reported using just 32,300.

Missouri鈥檚 effort provides a window into the complexities of covid testing at K-12 schools, even before the highly transmissible delta variant surged through. Delta鈥檚 spread has mired communities in emotional fights about how to safely send children 鈥 who are mostly unvaccinated 鈥 back to classrooms, particularly in states like Missouri, bedeviled by a high aversion to mask mandates and low vaccination rates. As classes begin, once again schools must weigh testing and other strategies to limit covid鈥檚 spread 鈥 potentially without a deep supply of test kits available.

Missouri educators described the testing that began last October as a blessing, for rooting out infected people and giving teachers peace of mind. But its logistical challenges quickly became clear, according to interviews and documents obtained by KHN. Dozens of schools or districts that applied for rapid tests listed just one health care professional to administer them. The rapid tests initially were set to expire after six months, so officials were reluctant to order too many. And some worried the tests would deliver inaccurate results or that on-site testing of someone with covid symptoms might spread infection.

鈥淲e were nervous鈥 about sick kids being on campus, said Kelly Garrett, executive director of KIPP St. Louis, a charter school with 2,800 students and 300 staffers. Elementary students returned in November. It reserved its 120 tests for 鈥渆mergency鈥 situations.

鈥淪chools that don鈥檛 have a nurse on-site or any kind of medical staff on-site, it鈥檚 just not as simple,鈥 said Robert Milner, principal of Hope Leadership Academy, a charter school in Kansas City that shipped dozens of tests back to the state. Milner said his school was able to mitigate covid with measures like temperature checks, a mask requirement, physical distancing and even getting rid of air dryers in bathrooms. Plus, 鈥淚 have other options that I can send my families to鈥 in the community for testing.

鈥淲e have no plans, nor is it our job, to administer this test to everyone,鈥 Lyndel Whittle, a public school superintendent, wrote in one district鈥檚 application for tests. The district, Iberia R-V, requested 100 rapid tests in its October application, enough to provide one to each staff member.

鈥淲e’re a school, not a healthcare provider,鈥 Whittle wrote.

鈥榃e Weren鈥檛 Shutting Down鈥

As the limits of remote learning became clear last year, officials pressed for a return to school. Gov. Mike Parson at one point said children would inevitably contract the virus at school, but 鈥渢hey鈥檙e going to get over it.鈥 Now, even as childhood covid cases rise because of the delta variant, districts nationwide are increasingly under pressure to return to full-time classroom instruction.

Testing in K-12 schools generally has been limited, according to experts, despite the huge investment in rapid antigen tests. More recently, the Biden administration distributed $10 billion through the American Rescue Plan Act to increase in schools, including $185 million for Missouri.

Missouri is establishing a program for K-12 schools to regularly test people without symptoms, relying on a contract with Ginkgo Bioworks, in which the biotech company provides testing materials, training and staffing. As of mid-August, only 19 institutions had expressed interest, said Lisa Cox, state Department of Health and Senior Services spokesperson.

Unlike covid tests that use a polymerase chain reaction technique, which could take days to deliver results, rapid antigen tests return results within minutes. The trade-off: Studies have shown they are less accurate.

Still, for Halley Russell, president of the Missouri State Teachers Association and a high school teacher in Jackson, Missouri, it was a relief to have rapid tests and she wished they鈥檇 had them sooner. Her district, Jackson R-2, applied in December and began using them in January, months after schools reopened.

鈥淭he timeline was just hard: We couldn鈥檛 rapid-test students we thought could have [covid],鈥 she said. 鈥淪ome of them just quarantined.鈥

鈥淯ltimately, I think, there was a level of anxiety the entire time because we were face-to-face, we weren鈥檛 shutting down,鈥 said Russell, whose classroom required masks. 鈥淭esting just gives you some control over things you can鈥檛 control.鈥

Allison Dolak, principal of Immanuel Lutheran Church & School in Wentzville, Missouri, said her small parochial school had the means to use rapid covid tests for students and staffers 鈥 but it took ingenuity.

Dolak said applying for tests was a 鈥渘o-brainer鈥 to help keep their doors open. 鈥淭here would have been so many kids that had to online-learn had we not had those tests,鈥 she said. At times, the suburban St. Louis school had to call on parents who were nurses to administer them. Dolak even performed a few herself in the parking lot. State data as of early June shows the school received 200 tests and used 132. It did not require masking.

Many schools indicated they intended to test only staff members, applications obtained by KHN show. Missouri directed schools at first to use Abbott鈥檚 rapid tests on symptomatic people, which further limited testing.

Arguably, some of the reasons limited testing occurred aren鈥檛 bad 鈥 in interviews, educators said they curbed infections by screening for symptoms and requiring masks. Currently, Missouri authorizes testing on symptomatic and asymptomatic people.

鈥淚n the K-12 space, there really has not been that much testing,鈥 said , a professor of pediatrics at Northwestern University鈥檚 Feinberg School of Medicine. 鈥淚t really has been more that kids have symptoms screened before they鈥檝e gone to school, and if they become symptomatic then they鈥檙e tested.鈥

At least 64 schools and districts that received tests hadn鈥檛 administered a single one, according to state dashboard data that schools self-report, as of early June.

Others that applied didn鈥檛 follow through on their orders or decided against administering tests, according to interviews and documents obtained by KHN.

One was the Maplewood Richmond Heights district in St. Louis County, which directed people away from schools for testing.

鈥淲hile the antigen test is decent, there were some false negatives,鈥 Vince Estrada, director of student services, said by email. 鈥淔or example, if a student had been exposed to someone with COVID-19, and tested negative with the antigen test at school, we would still require them to get a PCR test.鈥 Space for testing and nurse availability were also issues, he added.

鈥淢any of our school districts don鈥檛 have capacity to store the tests, to manage the testing,鈥 said , executive director of the Show-Me School-Based Health Alliance of Missouri, which focuses on access to health services at school.

鈥楢 Lot鈥 of Tests Returned Unused

Sherry Weldon, administrator of the Livingston County Health Center in northwestern Missouri, said the public health agency ran tests for personnel in county schools, both public and private. 鈥淣one of the schools want to take that on themselves,鈥 she said. 鈥淭hey just were like, oh, God, no.鈥

When the school year was over, Weldon, a registered nurse, said she shipped back 鈥渁 lot鈥 of unused tests, although she has since reordered to offer rapid testing to the public.

Cox, the DHSS spokesperson, said as of mid-August the state had recouped 139,000 unused tests from K-12 schools.

Recouped tests would be redistributed 鈥 the shelf life of Abbott鈥檚 rapid antigen test has been extended to one year 鈥 but officials aren鈥檛 tracking how many have been, Cox said. Schools are not required to report expired antigen test quantities to the state.

Mallory McGowin, spokesperson for Missouri鈥檚 Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, said 鈥渁bsolutely there have been tests that have expired.鈥

Health officials also sent rapid tests to long-term care facilities, hospitals and jails, among other locations. As of mid-August, the state had distributed 1.5 million of the 1.75 million antigen tests it received from the federal government. After accounting for tests K-12 schools didn鈥檛 use, the state had shipped them 131,800 tests as of Aug. 17. 鈥淚t quickly became clear,鈥 Cox said, 鈥渢he tests we had pushed out were not being fully utilized.鈥

When asked whether schools were equipped to handle testing, McGowin said having such resources was a 鈥渞eal opportunity鈥 but also 鈥渁 real challenge.鈥 But 鈥渁t the local level, there鈥檚 only so many people,鈥 she said, 鈥渢o help with covid protocols.鈥

School covid testing could 鈥渕ake a big difference,鈥 said Dr. , chief of Stanford University鈥檚 pediatric infectious diseases division. However, the more important strategies to limit spread are masking, increased ventilation and getting more people vaccinated.

鈥淭esting is more icing on the cake,鈥 she said.