A COVID-19 vaccine could be available earlier than expected if ongoing clinical trials produce overwhelmingly positive results, said Dr. Anthony Fauci, the nation鈥檚 top infectious disease official, in an interview Tuesday with KHN.
Although two ongoing clinical trials of 30,000 volunteers are expected to conclude by the end of the year, Fauci said an independent board has the authority to end the trials weeks early if interim results are overwhelmingly positive or negative.
The Data and Safety Monitoring Board could say, 鈥溾楾he data is so good right now that you can say it鈥檚 safe and effective,鈥欌 Fauci said. In that case, researchers would have 鈥渁 moral obligation鈥 to end the trial early and make the active vaccine available to everyone in the study, including those who had been given placebos 鈥 and accelerate the process to give the vaccine to millions.
Fauci鈥檚 comments come at a time of growing concern about whether political pressure from the Trump administration could influence federal regulators and scientists overseeing the nation鈥檚 response to the novel coronavirus pandemic, and erode shaky public confidence in vaccines. Prominent have said they fear Trump is pushing for an early vaccine approval to help win reelection.
Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said he trusts the independent members of the DSMB 鈥 who are not government employees 鈥 to hold vaccines to high standards without being politically influenced. Members of the board are typically experts in vaccine science and biostatistics who teach at major medical schools.
鈥淚f you are making a decision about the vaccine, you鈥檇 better be sure you have very good evidence that it is both safe and effective,鈥 Fauci said. 鈥淚鈥檓 not concerned about political pressure.鈥
The safety board periodically looks at data from a clinical trial to determine if it鈥檚 ethical to continue enrolling volunteers, who are randomly assigned to receive either an experimental vaccine or a placebo shot. Neither the volunteers nor the health workers who vaccinate them know which shot they鈥檙e receiving.
Manufacturers are now testing three COVID vaccines in large-scale U.S. trials. The first two studies 鈥 one led by Moderna and the National Institutes of Health and the other led by Pfizer and BioNTech 鈥 began in late July. Each study was designed to enroll 30,000 participants. Company officials have said both trials have enrolled about half that total. , which has been running large-scale clinical trials in Great Britain, Brazil and South Africa, launched another large-scale vaccine study this week in the U.S., involving 30,000 volunteers. Additional vaccine trials are expected to begin this month.
In trials of this size, researchers will know if a vaccine is effective after as few as , said Dr. Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in a call with reporters Friday.
鈥淚t may be surprising, but the number of events that need to occur is relatively small,鈥 Redfield said.
Right now, only the safety board has access to the trial data, said Paul Mango, deputy chief of staff for policy at the Department of Health and Human Services. As for when trial results will be available, 鈥渨e cannot determine if it will be the middle of October or December.鈥
Safety boards set 鈥渟topping rules鈥 at the beginning of a study, making their criteria for ending a trial very clear, said Dr. Eric Topol, executive vice president for research at Scripps Research in San Diego and an expert on the use of data in medical research.
Although the safety board can recommend stopping a trial, the ultimate decision to halt a study is made by the scientists running the trial, Topol said.
A vaccine manufacturer could then apply to the Food and Drug Administration for an emergency use authorization, which can be granted quickly, or continue through the regular drug approval process, which requires more time and evidence.
Safety monitors also can stop a trial because of safety concerns, 鈥渋f it looks like it鈥檚 actually harming people in the vaccine arm, due to a lot of adverse events,鈥 Fauci said.
Fauci said people can trust the process, because all the data that outside monitors used to make their decisions would be made public.
鈥淎ll of that has to be transparent,鈥 Fauci said. 鈥淭he only time you get concerned is if there is any pressure to terminate the trial before you have enough data on safety and efficacy.鈥
Topol and other scientists have the FDA in recent weeks, accusing Commissioner Stephen Hahn of bowing to political pressure from the Trump administration, which has pushed the agency to approve COVID treatments faster.
Stopping trials early poses a number of risks, such as making a vaccine look more effective than it really is, Topol said.
鈥淚f you stop something early, you can get an exaggerated benefit that isn鈥檛 real,鈥 because less positive evidence only emerges later, Topol said.
Stopping the studies early also could prevent researchers from recruiting more minority volunteers. So far, only about 1 in 5 trial participants are . Given that Blacks and Hispanics have been hit harder than other groups by the pandemic, Topol said, it鈥檚 important that they make up a larger part of vaccine trials.
Ending vaccine trials early also carries safety risks, said Dr. Paul Offit, a vaccine developer who serves on an NIH advisory panel on COVID vaccines and treatments.
A smaller, shorter trial could fail to detect important vaccine side effects, which could become apparent only after millions of people have been immunized, said Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.
Researchers will continue to follow vaccinated volunteers for a full year to look for long-term side effects, Redfield said.
And Fauci acknowledged that cutting a trial short could undermine public confidence in COVID vaccines. One American in three is unwilling to get a COVID vaccine, according to a recent Gallup Poll.
